Re: [NTG-context] registered function call [1160]:...live/2023/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/mkiv/l-sandbox.lua:87: cannot open /.: Permission denied - Alpine Linux

fc resizing in math mode The only mention of anything similar happened back in 2009 (but then again this was with mkii). There may be more similar issues in the list. I just didn't have the time to look for it. https://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context@ntg.nl/msg40224.html But anyhow, the follow

[NTG-context] Macro to write a vector with Metafun (again)

rnative=mp] \setupmathstackers [bottom] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \starttext $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

It's very puzzling... but I'll try to get myself back together, by ignoring everything up to the next `;'. Please insert a semicolon now in front of anything that you don't want me to delete. (See Chapter 27 of The METAFONTbook for an example.) [1] 51 52 $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

% vfenced] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \setupmathstackers [top] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \setupmathstackers [bottom] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \starttext $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blan

[NTG-context] Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

thstackers [bottom] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \starttext $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

tive=mp] > > \setupmathstackers > [top] > [color=darkred, >alternative=mp] > > \setupmathstackers > [bottom] > [color=darkred, >alternative=mp] > > \starttext > > $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad > \doublebracket

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d}

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

gt; \stopuniqueMPgraphic > > \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2192} > math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ; > \stopuniqueMPgraphic > > % so far > > \setupmathstackers > [both] % vfenced] > [color=darkred, >alternative=mp] >

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

or=darkred, alternative=mp] \setupmathstackers [bottom] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \starttext $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+

Re: [NTG-context] underbraces slightly too narrow (with MkIV 2013.05.28)

in a next version you can do this: \setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt] is it looks like these commands have built-in \limits, these are now set for \overbrace \overparent \overbracket \overbar \underbrace \underparent \underbracket \underbar \doublebrace \doubleparent \doublebracket